search

OpenSource

In the crypto industry, the temptation to "just fork Uniswap" or "use an open-source matching engine" is high. It feels sovereign, free, and controllable.

However, for a business focused on User Acquisition and Revenue, this is often a fatal distraction.

hashtag
1. Code is Free, Infrastructure is Not

An open-source repo gives you the logic files (.sol, .rs). It does NOT give you:

  • The Indexer: You need to run a robust Graph Node or Ponder instance to show users their trade history. (High RAM/CPU cost).

  • The Keeper Bots: Limit orders don't fill themselves. You need a fleet of bots monitoring the chain to execute trades.

  • The Liquidity: A fork starts with an empty orderbook. Who is filling the first trade?

Reality: "Free" code requires $2,000/mo in AWS bills and DevOps time to actually be usable.

hashtag
2. The Maintenance Trap

Protocols evolve. Vulnerabilities are found.

  • Scenario: A critical vulnerability is found in the dependencies of your matching engine.

  • Fork: You must pause operations, find a Rust engineer, patch it, redeploy, and migrate state.

  • SaaS: We patch it instantly across the fleet. You don't even wake up.

hashtag
3. The "Liquid Liquidity" Problem

  • Open Source Fork: You are an island. You have 0 orders. You need to hire Market Makers (costing $10k/mo retainer) just to quote prices.

  • Shared Orderbook (SaaS): You plug into our "Global Liquidity Layer". Your users immediately see tight spreads provided by our institutional partners.

hashtag
Conclusion

  • Choose Open Source if: You are a funded R&D team building a new distinct protocol primitive.

  • Choose SaaS if: You are a Product team building a business (Casino, Exchange, Game) and need to launch this month.

PreviousHow to Choose a Matching EngineNextCase Study

Last updated